<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kids&#8217;s Love&#8217;em</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.apostropheabuse.com/2009/09/kidss-loveem.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.apostropheabuse.com/2009/09/kidss-loveem.html</link>
	<description>Links and visuals illustrating an orthographic pet peeve.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:45:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.apostropheabuse.com/2009/09/kidss-loveem.html#comment-3930</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 01:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apostropheabuse.com/2009/09/kidss-loveem.html#comment-3930</guid>
		<description>This one made me wonder how exactly do you spell the sound &quot;ewah&quot;?  So phonetically it would go kidz-ez?  This one makes my head hurt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This one made me wonder how exactly do you spell the sound &quot;ewah&quot;?  So phonetically it would go kidz-ez?  This one makes my head hurt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chasing Satan Away &#38;</title>
		<link>http://www.apostropheabuse.com/2009/09/kidss-loveem.html#comment-3913</link>
		<dc:creator>Chasing Satan Away &#38;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 02:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apostropheabuse.com/2009/09/kidss-loveem.html#comment-3913</guid>
		<description>Apostrophe Clusterf*ck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apostrophe Clusterf*ck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.apostropheabuse.com/2009/09/kidss-loveem.html#comment-3912</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 14:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apostropheabuse.com/2009/09/kidss-loveem.html#comment-3912</guid>
		<description>Obviously, the &#039;em is a contraction for them.&lt;br /&gt;More acceptable would have been &quot;Kids love &#039;em&quot; as opposed to &quot;Kids love&#039;em&quot;. I say this is forgivable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously, the &#39;em is a contraction for them.<br />More acceptable would have been &quot;Kids love &#39;em&quot; as opposed to &quot;Kids love&#39;em&quot;. I say this is forgivable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ebryant</title>
		<link>http://www.apostropheabuse.com/2009/09/kidss-loveem.html#comment-3890</link>
		<dc:creator>ebryant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apostropheabuse.com/2009/09/kidss-loveem.html#comment-3890</guid>
		<description>Lol wouldn&#039;t the correct incorrect way be &quot;kids&#039; love&#039;em&quot;? Or maybe since it is a double incorrect it cancels itself out and becomes correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol wouldn&#39;t the correct incorrect way be &quot;kids&#39; love&#39;em&quot;? Or maybe since it is a double incorrect it cancels itself out and becomes correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

