<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We do Mom&#8217;s and Dad&#8217;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.apostropheabuse.com/2009/01/we-do-moms-and-dads.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.apostropheabuse.com/2009/01/we-do-moms-and-dads.html</link>
	<description>Links and visuals illustrating an orthographic pet peeve.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:16:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.apostropheabuse.com/2009/01/we-do-moms-and-dads.html#comment-3406</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jan 2009 01:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apostropheabuse.com/2009/01/we-do-moms-and-dads.html#comment-3406</guid>
		<description>We Do Mom&#039;s and Dad&#039;s (Hair cuts) too. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;NOT: &quot;We do [have sexual intercourse with] mom&#039;s and dad&#039;s. In which case the apostrophe use would be wrong as it indicates ownership. Mom&#039;s and Dad&#039;s what? ... &quot;hair cuts&quot; is the answer.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This is just an object omission. The use of apostrophe with the absence of an object is correct via omission of obvious information. For instance: - the place is obviously a hair salon. I am a grammar teacher. 5 years now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We Do Mom&#8217;s and Dad&#8217;s (Hair cuts) too. </p>
<p>NOT: &#8220;We do [have sexual intercourse with] mom&#8217;s and dad&#8217;s. In which case the apostrophe use would be wrong as it indicates ownership. Mom&#8217;s and Dad&#8217;s what? &#8230; &#8220;hair cuts&#8221; is the answer.</p>
<p>This is just an object omission. The use of apostrophe with the absence of an object is correct via omission of obvious information. For instance: &#8211; the place is obviously a hair salon. I am a grammar teacher. 5 years now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drew</title>
		<link>http://www.apostropheabuse.com/2009/01/we-do-moms-and-dads.html#comment-3374</link>
		<dc:creator>Drew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apostropheabuse.com/2009/01/we-do-moms-and-dads.html#comment-3374</guid>
		<description>&quot;Sounds like somebody sat on a frog&quot; is what my dad used to say when we were kids and someone farted...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sounds like somebody sat on a frog&#8221; is what my dad used to say when we were kids and someone farted&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.apostropheabuse.com/2009/01/we-do-moms-and-dads.html#comment-3372</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 00:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apostropheabuse.com/2009/01/we-do-moms-and-dads.html#comment-3372</guid>
		<description>Re &quot;childrens&#039; haircuts&quot;: please hand in your apostrophe licence to the nearest grammar teacher.  Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re &#8220;childrens&#8217; haircuts&#8221;: please hand in your apostrophe licence to the nearest grammar teacher.  Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

