Skip to content


Li’l Problem…

…unless they’re abbreviating “Lilliputian Angelz” or something.

(Thanks to David, who points out, “at least the misspelling’s on purpose!”)

Posted in Uncategorized.


4 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Daniel Samuels says

    I think “Lil’” is supposed to be short for “Little”

  2. Anonymous says

    DS — yep, but Li’l is the accepted abbreviated form, not Lil’

  3. Nigel says

    Is it really true that there is an “accepted” abbreviated form for this? Surely strictly speaking – i.e., following standard apostrophe rule – it should be Li’l’. After all, you are missing the e from the end as well as the ts (or should that be t‘s?!) from the middle.

  4. altgrave says

    it should, but it isn’t (the unofficial slogan of english).



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.