Li’l Problem…


…unless they’re abbreviating “Lilliputian Angelz” or something.

(Thanks to David, who points out, “at least the misspelling’s on purpose!”)

  1. #1 by Daniel Samuels on October 21, 2008 - 6:04 pm

    I think “Lil’” is supposed to be short for “Little”

  2. #2 by Anonymous on October 21, 2008 - 6:14 pm

    DS — yep, but Li’l is the accepted abbreviated form, not Lil’

  3. #3 by Nigel on October 25, 2008 - 1:33 am

    Is it really true that there is an “accepted” abbreviated form for this? Surely strictly speaking – i.e., following standard apostrophe rule – it should be Li’l’. After all, you are missing the e from the end as well as the ts (or should that be t‘s?!) from the middle.

  4. #4 by altgrave on April 11, 2009 - 1:36 am

    it should, but it isn’t (the unofficial slogan of english).

(will not be published)