Jenn sent in this abusive packaging for a baby toy:
…unless the name of the company is “Baby Is In Things”?!
This entry was posted on July 8, 2008, 3:42 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
#1 by Becky on July 8, 2008 - 8:39 pm
That duck kind of scares me!
#2 by Anonymous on July 10, 2008 - 4:35 am
I agree – that is very spooky – I do not think I would want my baby playing with it. It is like an alien duckie.
#3 by shiva on July 14, 2008 - 9:16 pm
Or Baby’s “N Things”… an unknown number of Things for your baby…
John Carpenter and HP Lovecraft come to mind…
#4 by Ant on July 15, 2008 - 7:38 pm
Star Trek – The Brog
anyone else make that connection?
#5 by noah on July 31, 2008 - 6:21 pm
also okay if it’s the “in thing” for a baby (“Baby’s ‘in’ thing”).
#1 by Becky on July 8, 2008 - 8:39 pm
That duck kind of scares me!
#2 by Anonymous on July 10, 2008 - 4:35 am
I agree – that is very spooky – I do not think I would want my baby playing with it. It is like an alien duckie.
#3 by shiva on July 14, 2008 - 9:16 pm
Or Baby’s “N Things”… an unknown number of Things for your baby…
John Carpenter and HP Lovecraft come to mind…
#4 by Ant on July 15, 2008 - 7:38 pm
Star Trek – The Brog
anyone else make that connection?
#5 by noah on July 31, 2008 - 6:21 pm
also okay if it’s the “in thing” for a baby (“Baby’s ‘in’ thing”).