This entry was posted on April 28, 2008, 12:50 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Fusion theme by digitalnature | powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS) ^
#1 by Anonymous on May 9, 2008 - 2:04 am
Isn’t this a proper (though redneck)way to abbreviate “ought to?”
#2 by Abigail on May 26, 2008 - 3:34 pm
I thought so too, at first, but typically an abbreviation means letters are removed. So maybe “ought’a”?
#3 by mattyu on May 27, 2008 - 9:19 am
Reminds me of this complex contraction:
1. I am going to
2. I am gonna
3. I’m gonna
4. I’m’a
#4 by Tom Biro on June 13, 2008 - 3:11 pm
It is actually even funnier because it’s covered by a plant.
#5 by Anonymous on August 26, 2008 - 2:56 am
Blogger Tom Biro said…
It is actually even funnier because it’s covered by a plant.
8:11 AM
LOL