This entry was posted on March 6, 2008, 8:28 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through RSS 2.0.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
i bet they didn’t get copyright permission. it omits the “red fish,” it doesn’t say “horton HEARS A WHO,” it only says “hop” instead of “hop on pop.” it just seems like they were trying to avoid a lawsuit by not using the complete or actual titles of the books. boo. shady.
It is a pity. On the surface it seems like a cute t-shirt, and then you see… Oi. I hope Marisa complained! I always wonder why they don’t put regulations in place. Even just so designers hire proof-readers, honestly.
I was in a shop in Ireland and I saw a whole range of underpants covered with a hand-print pattern with the words “Hand’s Off” on the waistband. I tell you.
#1 by Anonymous on March 11, 2008 - 8:14 pm
It’s also meant to be “One fish two fish RED FISH blue fish”, isn’t it?
#2 by Anonymous on March 12, 2008 - 12:11 am
Oh my…yes. You’re right. What a pity. =/
#3 by hellocasey on March 15, 2008 - 12:50 am
i bet they didn’t get copyright permission. it omits the “red fish,” it doesn’t say “horton HEARS A WHO,” it only says “hop” instead of “hop on pop.” it just seems like they were trying to avoid a lawsuit by not using the complete or actual titles of the books. boo. shady.
#4 by Grace on March 16, 2008 - 1:34 pm
It is a pity. On the surface it seems like a cute t-shirt, and then you see… Oi.
I hope Marisa complained!
I always wonder why they don’t put regulations in place. Even just so designers hire proof-readers, honestly.
I was in a shop in Ireland and I saw a whole range of underpants covered with a hand-print pattern with the words “Hand’s Off” on the waistband. I tell you.
#5 by Anonymous on March 27, 2008 - 6:54 am
I did not can not will not spell not,
I will not write it very well