<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Tattoo&#8217;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.apostropheabuse.com/2007/10/more-tattoos-2.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.apostropheabuse.com/2007/10/more-tattoos-2.html</link>
	<description>Links and visuals illustrating an orthographic pet peeve.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:33:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eeyore19</title>
		<link>http://www.apostropheabuse.com/2007/10/more-tattoos-2.html#comment-4004</link>
		<dc:creator>eeyore19</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apostropheabuse.com/2007/10/more-tattoos-2.html#comment-4004</guid>
		<description>Just because some idiots have tattoos doesn&#039;t mean all people with tattoos are idiots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because some idiots have tattoos doesn&#39;t mean all people with tattoos are idiots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.apostropheabuse.com/2007/10/more-tattoos-2.html#comment-2567</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apostropheabuse.com/2007/10/more-tattoos-2.html#comment-2567</guid>
		<description>People who get tatoos are idiots!  That&#039;s why!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People who get tatoos are idiots!  That&#8217;s why!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue</title>
		<link>http://www.apostropheabuse.com/2007/10/more-tattoos-2.html#comment-2566</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apostropheabuse.com/2007/10/more-tattoos-2.html#comment-2566</guid>
		<description>friendinme... Forever in Blue Jean&#039;s what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>friendinme&#8230; Forever in Blue Jean&#8217;s what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: friendinME</title>
		<link>http://www.apostropheabuse.com/2007/10/more-tattoos-2.html#comment-2558</link>
		<dc:creator>friendinME</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apostropheabuse.com/2007/10/more-tattoos-2.html#comment-2558</guid>
		<description>humph.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;How come my tattoo says, &lt;i&gt;&quot;Forever in Blue Jean&#039;s&quot;&lt;/i&gt;?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>humph.</p>
<p>How come my tattoo says, <i>&#8220;Forever in Blue Jean&#8217;s&#8221;</i>?</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.apostropheabuse.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tara</title>
		<link>http://www.apostropheabuse.com/2007/10/more-tattoos-2.html#comment-2554</link>
		<dc:creator>Tara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 14:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apostropheabuse.com/2007/10/more-tattoos-2.html#comment-2554</guid>
		<description>More often than not words on signs are pluralized using an apostrophe.  I&#039;m a copy editor, so this (and so much more) drives me bananas.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Anyone with an elementary-level education knows that apostrophes signify possession or represent missing letters, that they are not a means of pluralization.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I too wonder why we have this penchant for misused apostrophes. Laziness?  Because all of the cool kids do it? Rebellion? &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Sign makers: I&#039;m going to reveal a big copy editor&#039;s secret: Use the dictionary!  It will show you how to pluralize the word.  It doesn&#039;t take that long to look up a word, and it saves you embarrasment.  Do you really want your sign ridiculed here?  And it will help business. I&#039;m far more likely to go get tacos at the other store if you are advertising that you have &quot;taco&#039;s.&quot; Taco&#039;s what?  I&#039;m left wondering and wanting.  I know that the first store has more than one taco, but at your store I know only that you have something that belongs to taco, but you won&#039;t tell me what.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;m so glad I came across this blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More often than not words on signs are pluralized using an apostrophe.  I&#8217;m a copy editor, so this (and so much more) drives me bananas.  </p>
<p>Anyone with an elementary-level education knows that apostrophes signify possession or represent missing letters, that they are not a means of pluralization.  </p>
<p>I too wonder why we have this penchant for misused apostrophes. Laziness?  Because all of the cool kids do it? Rebellion? </p>
<p>Sign makers: I&#8217;m going to reveal a big copy editor&#8217;s secret: Use the dictionary!  It will show you how to pluralize the word.  It doesn&#8217;t take that long to look up a word, and it saves you embarrasment.  Do you really want your sign ridiculed here?  And it will help business. I&#8217;m far more likely to go get tacos at the other store if you are advertising that you have &#8220;taco&#8217;s.&#8221; Taco&#8217;s what?  I&#8217;m left wondering and wanting.  I know that the first store has more than one taco, but at your store I know only that you have something that belongs to taco, but you won&#8217;t tell me what.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m so glad I came across this blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C Maryon</title>
		<link>http://www.apostropheabuse.com/2007/10/more-tattoos-2.html#comment-2550</link>
		<dc:creator>C Maryon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 22:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.apostropheabuse.com/2007/10/more-tattoos-2.html#comment-2550</guid>
		<description>Nouns ending with vowels in the singular seem to be a big problem when adding the s for the plural, particularly nouns ending in o or oo for some reason.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I wonder if this is quite a deep-seated aversion, now that I think about it - many vowel endings change spelling when pluralised - y becomes ies (except ey as in trolleys) o becomes oes (usually).  Why did we never simply add an s on the end?  That&#039;s all we do in speech today - perhaps in Middle or Old English from a thousand years ago, we actually pronounced plural noun-ending vowels differently to the vowel in the singular&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;There&#039;s a deep thought for a Friday</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nouns ending with vowels in the singular seem to be a big problem when adding the s for the plural, particularly nouns ending in o or oo for some reason.  </p>
<p>I wonder if this is quite a deep-seated aversion, now that I think about it &#8211; many vowel endings change spelling when pluralised &#8211; y becomes ies (except ey as in trolleys) o becomes oes (usually).  Why did we never simply add an s on the end?  That&#8217;s all we do in speech today &#8211; perhaps in Middle or Old English from a thousand years ago, we actually pronounced plural noun-ending vowels differently to the vowel in the singular</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a deep thought for a Friday</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

